Philadelphia police revoked the carry licenses of five members of the Black Lion Party for International Solidarity, citing ‘good cause.’ Is that constitutional?
Articles on SCOTUS
Displaying 1 - 20 of 109 articles
Mail-in voting was created during the Civil War so soldiers could vote. That legacy helped shape how the Supreme Court ruled more than 160 years later.
The US Supreme Court ruled that states could exclude transgender athletes from girls and women’s sports teams.
Two recent Supreme Court rulings suggest the high court is so pro-gun it has decided it must also be pro-drugs.
Grasping how the nation’s highest court makes policy requires stepping into an exceptionally regulated and sometimes hidden routine.
First Choice, the crisis pregnancy center chain that brought the case, argued that merely issuing a subpoena can deter donors from making a gift.
The court decided Colorado’s ban on conversion therapy violated the free speech of a talk therapist.
If conversion therapy is deemed speech, then bans on it likely will fall.
Griswold v. Connecticut, decided in 1965, set the precedent for several other landmark cases about sex and privacy.
School lawyers are petitioning the Supreme Court to hear Cambridge Christian School v. Florida High School Athletic Association.
What is the purpose of US District Courts
and Court of Appeals, and why do some courts have multiple judges and others have only one?
The Supreme Court just made it harder for judges to block presidential policies nationwide, but lawmakers hold the key to changing that.
The high court ordered the Trump administration to facilitate the return of a Maryland man, Kilmar Abrego García, to the United States.
The court’s decision on whether Medicaid patients can choose their own health care provider could have consequences far beyond South Carolina.
While the Court’s politics have veered right over the past decade, the justices’ prose has shifted left, becoming more colloquial and accessible.
Under Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court has made it much harder for federal prosecutors to go after corrupt state and local officials.
Even Louis XIV of France, the epitome of absolute monarchy, did not stand above the law. Kings have always been defined and constrained by legal precedent.
In two recent rulings, the conservative justices handed state lawmakers new power to redraw congressional maps to their liking – including in ways that end up diluting the Black vote.
The Supreme Court’s recent ruling means that judges will have more power than scientific experts in determining whether people should be able to get an emergency abortion, for example.
By injecting hidden risk into the financial statements of the listed companies monitored by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Supreme Court may have set the stage for the next recession.
Top contributors
-
Joseph Panzer Chair in Education and Research Professor of Law, University of Dayton
-
Associate Professor of Intellectual Heritage, Temple University
-
Director of the Center for Religion, Law & Democracy, Willamette University
-
Professor of American Civics, University of Tennessee
-
Professor of Law, George Washington University
-
Professor of Law, University of Virginia
-
Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
-
Associate Professor of Public Health, The Ohio State University
-
Associate Professor of Sociology and Women's and Gender Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
-
Professor of Political Science, Purdue University
-
Professor of Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, Oregon State University
-
Associate Professor of Philosophy and Law, Wayne State University; Institute for Humane Studies
-
Associate Professor of Political Science, Oregon State University
-
Professor and director emeritus, Institute for Rural Journalism, University of Kentucky
-
Assistant Professor of Law and Director, Environmental and Regulatory Law Clinic, University of Virginia