The Nationals leader said he’ll do ‘whatever it takes’ to beat the Labor government – including not ruling out a move to the lower house before the next election.
Articles on AI copyright
Displaying all articles
A recent survey of working musicians in Canada points to a growing discontent about AI in music, and points to how we could gain a music industry that allows Canadian music to flourish.
Listen to expert on shadow libraries Balázs Bodó on The Conversation Weekly podcast.
History suggests copyright adapts to technology. AI may be no exception.
Swift appears to be the first musician to take this step.
AI’s apparent inability to generate interesting and unique images and videos is becoming harder to ignore.
The age of AI is leading to barriers being put up across the open web. This could be the fix.
Can (or will) Spotify be held legally accountable for hosting AI knockoffs of real bands? An expert explains.
The new deal might seem like a ‘win’ for artists at face value. But how it actually benefits them remains unclear.
Studio Ghibli’s founder Hayao Miyazaki has been critical of AI previously. Now, ChatGPT is generating images in his world-famous animation style.
The AI train has left the station. Now, guardrails need to be hastily built to keep the technology from running the music industry off the tracks.
With the click of a button, you can now generate songs in any topic and genre you want. But it’s not clear-cut whether you own the music, despite what the app terms say.
With the right prompts, AI users can mimic copyrighted works. There’s no easy technical or legal fix.
It may seem extreme, but there’s a reason the law allows it.
Prosecraft creator Benji Smith believed he was honouring copyright laws, while using more than 25,000 books without authors’ consent. What does the law say? A copyright expert explains.
Mona Awad and Paul Tremblay’s lawsuit claims their books were used without their consent. But copyright protection doesn’t apply to ideas – they’ll need to demonstrate the likelihood of economic loss.
Intellectual property law wasn’t written with AI in mind, so it isn’t clear who owns the images that emerge from prompts – or if the artists whose work was scraped to train AI models should be paid.
Do you own a literary work that ChatGPT helped you write? Does OpenAI? The legal questions are thorny, and the answers unclear.
Top contributors
-
Senior Lecturer in Law, University of New England
-
Interim Pro Vice-Chancellor (Regional & Metro), University of Wollongong
-
Professor of Information Systems, Michigan State University
-
Assistant Professor of Race and Media, School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of South Carolina
-
PhD Candidate in Music Copyright, Bangor University; Liverpool Hope University
-
JD-PhD Student, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
-
Associate Professor of Law, Indiana University
-
Postdoctoral Associate in Social and Ethical Responsibilities of Computing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
-
Director of Sydney Executive Plus, Business School, University of Sydney
-
Professor of Information Technology and Organisation, University of Sydney
-
Associate Professor, UNSW
-
Professor, Faculty of Law, UNSW
-
Professor of Information Law and Policy, University of Amsterdam
-
Associate Professor, Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne
-
Associate Professor of Visual Communication & Digital Media, RMIT University