The Nationals leader said he’ll do ‘whatever it takes’ to beat the Labor government – including not ruling out a move to the lower house before the next election.
Articles on Copyright
Displaying 1 - 20 of 236 articles
What’s at play is investment from big AI companies versus the long-term interests of Australian creatives.
Copyright can only protect the expression of an idea, not an idea, concept or style itself.
Listen to expert on shadow libraries Balázs Bodó on The Conversation Weekly podcast.
History suggests copyright adapts to technology. AI may be no exception.
Anthony Albanese has made a spirited defence of artists’ rights in the AI age. But while data centres are getting concrete support, creators are not.
When AI is used to manufacture fake endorsements, copyright law doesn’t do enough to protect celebrities, influencers and other public figures.
Swift appears to be the first musician to take this step.
Efforts to use technology to police copyright evolved into companies using copyright law to lock people out of repairing their own devices.
It’s a relatively new legal tactic and not yet tested in court.
William Billings has been largely forgotten, except among music historians. But he was the country’s first notable composer, penning protest songs against Great Britain.
AI’s apparent inability to generate interesting and unique images and videos is becoming harder to ignore.
The age of AI is leading to barriers being put up across the open web. This could be the fix.
Has our culture’s begrudging acceptance of ghostwriting paved the way for everyone – not just the rich and famous – to offload the hard work of writing?
A high-stakes dispute forcing copyright law to confront a long-standing problem: how to define ‘originality’ for the protection of musical works.
Different licensing models could help ensure the rights of creators are reconciled with AI companies’ hunger for data.
AI ‘learns’ by digesting copyright-protected material, with billions at stake. Proper licensing deals offer the best solution for authors, artists and publishers.
The largest copyright settlement in US history has established a crucial legal precedent for the relationship between AI companies and content creators.
Exemptions to copyright legislation for AI would disadvantage Australian writers – and set a bad precedent.
When is it acceptable to use AI in academic publishing?
Top contributors
-
Professor of Intellectual Property Law, City St George's, University of London
-
Professor, Queensland University of Technology
-
Senior Lecturer in Law, University of New England
-
Associate Professor, School of Law, Queensland University of Technology
-
Law Honours Candidate, University of Canberra
-
Executive Dean of the Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology
-
Regents Professor of Law and Communication and Director of the Center for Law and Intellectual Property, Texas A&M University
-
Reader in Intellectual Property Law, Brunel University of London
-
Professor in Intellectual Property and Innovation Law, Queensland University of Technology
-
Associate Professor of Screen Media, Victoria University
-
Associate Professor, School of Law, University of Canberra
-
Professor of Law, University of Melbourne; Chair of Private Law, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington
-
Research Fellow, Intellectual Property and Innovation Law Research Program, Queensland University of Technology
-
Senior Lecturer, Department of Media and Communications, University of Sydney
-
Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Technology Sydney