A proposal to change the mix of company taxes would lead to higher national income over time by collecting more from foreign investors.
Articles on Taxation reform
Displaying 1 - 20 of 83 articles
The government moved quickly after its election victory to seek ideas for economic reform. As it prepares the next federal budget, we cannot let that momentum lapse.
When it comes to improving the fairness of the tax system, this is no time to be squeamish.
It’s time to reform stamp duty, one of the most inefficient and distorting taxes collected by Australia’s state and territory governments.
Every Democratic presidential candidate plans to raise taxes on wealthier Americans and corporations, but they differ in how to get there.
France agreed to postpone implementing its law to tax US technology giants as negotiators from nearly 140 countries seek agreement on reforms to the international tax system.
Personal income taxpayers are shouldering more of the burden, while less revenue is coming from taxes on companies, capital and consumption. Only major reforms will change these sustained trends.
Millions of older Australians live in houses that don’t safely meet their needs, but they’re not ready for a nursing home. Lack of suitable housing and the moving costs leave them with nowhere to go.
Congress changed the tax system to benefit companies with overseas operations but failed to help Americans actually living abroad, who still face punitive taxation.
Far from dispelling the notion among Americans that the system is ‘rigged’ against them, Republican tax plans are more likely to make matters worse.
Traffic congestion is the main cost that cars create when they use existing roads. Road use charges are a more efficient and fairer way to cover the cost and help ensure traffic flows.
Unlike the Panama Papers, the latest leak shines a light on the elites of the offshore world.
The Republican tax plan would ultimately make the current system less progressive while reducing the overall burden, two things research shows make countries less happy.
Outrage over tax reform is nothing new. But if we can’t be calm about tax, we can at least learn from the stories spoken in anger.
President Trump recently released his tax plan, but he’s also said he wants to stimulate the economy with infrastructure spending. Is one more effective than the other at boosting growth?
President Trump released details of his tax plan, which would essentially benefit the wealthiest Americans by repealing the estate tax and other changes at the expense of the middle class.
Analysis shows that rising inequality over the past 20 years makes it harder to increase taxes and makes citizens less willing to pay them.
Consider these home truths: value capture is a tax, it would need to apply to the family home and deciding which areas it covers would be politically contentious. A broad-based land tax is simpler.
The idea of a minimum wage has become widely accepted so why is a maximum wage so controversial?
Paul Cleary makes a good case as to why Australia should follow Norway as an example of how to tax miners in Trillion Dollar Baby.
Top contributors
-
Associate Professor, University of Sydney
-
Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra
-
Adjunct Professor, Curtin Law School and Curtin Business School, Curtin University
-
Professiorial Fellow, The University of Melbourne
-
Professor, Department of Economics, The University of Melbourne
-
Part-Time Professor of Economics, The New School
-
Lecturer, School of Taxation ＆ Business Law, UNSW
-
Professor of Economics, University of Canberra
-
Associate Professor, Accounting, University of Technology Sydney
-
Vice-Chancellor’s Fellow, University of Tasmania
-
Visiting Professor of Tax Law, New York University, and Professor of Law, The University of Melbourne
-
Professor of Taxation, QUT Business School, and ARC Future Fellow, Queensland University of Technology
-
Scientia Professor of Economics, UNSW
-
John Curtin Distinguished Professor, Curtin University
-
Lecturer, Public Sector Finance, University of Canberra